Quote:
Originally Posted by theking
No...you have not and cannot post any "actual evidence" to the contrary...because said evidence does not exist...other than in your own mind.
|
Unfotunately for your belief system, you're incorrect. And you should refer to links in this thread for confirmation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by theking
On the other hand...there is actual evidence of planes hitting the towers...there is actual evidence of the fires in the towers and there is actual evidence of the towers collasping...a case of what you see is what you get.
|
These are facts... however they did not and could not have led to complete collapse, and you cannot provide evidence or facts to back this up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
And I'm telling you I've flown an airplane with about sixty seconds of instruction without so much as stepping foot in a classroom. Could I land the plane? Highly unlikely. But all of these guys went to flight school, so it's not like they couldn't do it.
|
Uh... and they failed miserably. What are you trying to corroborate here?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
The entire building, flood by floor, was airtight. When you stepped into the lobby, there was a breeze going through the entire floor - which was like five or six stories tall. Every floor was airtight. Every elevator shaft was airtight. When you stepped outside on the observation deck, you had to fight with the door because of the suction.
|
Who cares? What the fuck are you talking about?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
You slice that building with an airplane, that changes everything. You have multiple floors with a huge gaping hole. The elevator shafts - which had access to nearly all floors - were no longer airtight. The floors with sky lobbies were no longer air tight. The lobby had it's windows blown out, and was no longer air tight.
|
So you're saying as I did that the bulding was no longer "air tight" once the jets broke into them.? I mean be consistent. You're contradicting yourself and all your contentions here....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
So much happened that day that they couldn't report it all in three hundred pages. At a certain point in time, they had to pick and choose what to put in the final condensed report.
|
So you're saying that the 9/11 Commission Report was inaccurate and edited for length considerations... ok. So they lied just because they "had to" considering length... and what else? I mean you're the expert so what's with all this false reporting?
:D