Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
The impact speed was secondary.
|
You cannot dismiss speed because it does not fit with your view of the "Facts".
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
Another thing is the actual speed of the airliner - according to pilots who disagree with the official theory, commercial airliners couldn't reach or maintain such a speed at this elevation and air pressure. It's unlikely that they were actually going as fast as reported, and even if it was possible they wouldn't have compromised the entire structure's solidity.
|
Just because some pilots disagree doesn't mean they are right. Radar and GPS data make it easy to know the speed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
If they survived the impact, it wouldn't have affected their integrity.
|
Exactly how many supporting beams have to be wiped out before it would infect the integrity of the building?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
According to readings, they oscillated perfectly and behaved exactly according to projections.
|
Oscillation did not destroy the buildings. Projections did not include the melting of steal beams. WTC was built in the 1960's before computer aided design. There was no possible way to simulate a plane crashing into it, let alone render it and the damage due to fire, especially in any great detail. "Projections" at the time, while I'm sure based on the best engineers at the time, were nothing more than good guesses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
There's no reason - and there were no indications - that they would crash down through their basements.
|
The amount of energy at floor level was 5 x 10^11 Joules.
http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf . More than enough energy to crash through the basement and destroy everything.