Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Oh no, I took science right out of it and now it makes perfect sense.
You told me that the fire didn't burn hot enough to bend the steel beams. But then you told me that Thermite must have been used, which means the fire was four times hotter than required to bend the steel beams. Once you take science out of everything, anything you say makes perfect sense.
|
No, I said the government's version isn't consistent or logical because it's version has fires burning much below and for much less time required to soften/bend/weaken steel.
The only way the steel could have softened/bent/weakened so much - and so universally and equally - in such a short time is if the alternate theory were accurate.
:D