Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDalton
Paul, i have absolutely no interest to discuss that for the 98th time since you dont acknowledge anything else than your own opinion anyways  |
So answer this.
Would you of shot for a market that made you less money?
Not as an add on, like we did. But as your main market.
Many shooters were able to get into the porn production business because of the lower demands from the Internet porn sponsors. Most would never of survived without the low entry requirements. Producing for magazines or videos would of sent them bankrupt.
Those who were in the better paying levels, were never going to drop down to a lower paying level. Even if the level was $600, they would be fools to start shooting for $500 unless as an add on or forced to.
This thread is about producing better selling porn, not fitting into the price sponsors are able or willing to pay. Finally the market for better end is coming back Sellers have realised there's more money in doing something a guy who bought his first digital camera last week can do.
You and Max have both risen to a higher level. Are either of you shooting $300 solo girl full sets and videos scenes as your main market? I don't think you are, you've climbed up the ladder and not dropping down again.
Pretty sure Max left that behind as well.
OK your opinion is right, we should of stopped shooting better paying work and turned to the cheaper stuff. LOL