Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger
Yeah, I saw that. Not only spelling, but some sentences without verbs and a couple of missing words. But I saw it as I looked it all over after it went out. And unfortunately, there really isn't a process to revise or correct those artifacts of time crunch. There would be process to revise and correct them in an appeal in court, but not here. They do no harm. And it's not my way to sanitize or correct them for public consumption. Like the Romans, I don't mind being seen "warts and all" as the Romans told their sculptors. It's a good solid job, and like all things and persons human, it is imperfect.
Let's all just hope that it works. I don't think anyone has ever tried this before, and so we're on a road uncharted. And it may just precipitate some good things for many people. That's what I hope.
|
I'm not taking about the filings, but rather the few paragraphs on your web page here:
http://www.xxxlaw.com/news/
Thre's certainly a process to correct that - Posts > Edit
People reading the filings may be accustomed to reading statutes with sentences of 357 words, so whatver is in the filing, screw it. I'm talking about the few paragraphs on your web page where you announce it.
__________________
For historical display only. This information is not current:
support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
Strongbox - The next generation in site security
Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids