Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherry7
Time to move your dusty ideas of photography from old porn mags and into the new century. There is not a cobwebed old photo bible of does and don't s....
|
So a fed up look on a girls face, bad pose is now the new erotica. Got it thanks for clearing that up.
Quote:
Yes, I m not telling you the camera by showing you a picture with SONY NEX and N5 in the pictures. I also started a thread showing this camera a few weeks ago.
How will you ever find out what us "amateurs" are up to?
|
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2011/0...l-of-features/
Got to be honest for $700 approx and does away with the need of a video camera and a stills camera, great buy. Where is the hot shoe for a trigger and the mike socket?
All you need now is to learn what's sexy and what's not. And you might have a clue.
Quote:
|
I would agree if it was cut off in the middle of her foot making it look longer than normal. but this looks like an ok cut to me.
|
seeing as if he had framed it a tad lower he would of got everything in, or cut off all the leg, you would be right. His framing is consistently bad and the looks on girls faces tell a view they're not feeling sexy.
Get the look on her face.
Didn't Photoshop out the appendix scar of moles.
Always take a razor and foam to a photo shoot. seems he has a thing about stubble. Maybe the first time he gave a girl a BJ he got a rash from her stubble. Not sexy.
Is out of focus, cheap lamp with wire and bedside cabinet, cutting off a girls head in the new book on erotic photography?
Again nothing special or professional. Bad posing, bad cropping and nothing coming from the photo that makes us thin it's sexy.
The problem I have with Cherry is his endless twaddle about shooting erotica when he's nothing but an amateur and his work shows that over and over again. If he wasn't making great claims to be something he's not I would have no problems with him .