Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
I guess it went right past you ... |
I guess so. Which part went right past me?
The part where every single legal complaint makes the argument that they have filed the lawsuit in the proper venue and jurisdiction? Or the part where just because you have an offshore shell corp doesn't mean you won't still get sued in the place where you are proven to actually operate your business, as happens all the time when offshore companies are involved? Pretty basic and standard stuff. Not sure what you think is a "game changer" or "interesting" as nothing new is being argued and there is no new strategy being used. The guy gets paid in the US (presumably) and uses US addresses for DMCA notices etc (not necessarily proof of anything at all when its a local agent). So he made himself open to being sued in the US.