Quote:
Originally Posted by Far-L
But it does take a smart judge to actually make a fair comparison. By not adding into your equation the program owners that are doing good sign ups and do not own tubes you kind of paint a lopsided summary of what has been discussed in this thread.
|
I do not see very many program owners supporting tubes in this thread...but I see a lot complaining...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far-L
So what you are doing is called sophistry and it is misleadingly mistaken for logic.
.
|
Logic says that a site like orgasm.xxx, that supposedly gets 120 sign ups/day only from tube traffic, is not hard to make, it has mediocre quality girls, good camera but not great, average website, a super competitive/saturated niche like lesbians and teens. The whole site screams "nothing special" but it gets 120 sign ups per day just form tubes? No disrespect to the site owner, kudos to him, I have no website and I am nobody to judge just stating the obvious BUT:
why do tubes not get more support in this thread from program owners who are clearly capable of producing the same type of quality as orgasm.xxx?