|
Another point eroticsexxx (can't edit post to add this).
Let's speculate (which is what we're all doing anyways) that Zimmerman HADN'T been armed and that Treyvon had, as has been alleged, attacked Zimmerman. Obviously this all hangs on if there's actual physical evidence of such attack and Treyvon being the alleged aggressor.
Would you then defend Treyvon with such fervor? What would have given Treyvon the right to allegedly attack Zimmerman?
|