Originally Posted by MediaGuy

Of course not. The government's theory is that office fires brought down the buildings. The government theory refuses to acknowledge temperatures above that. We haven't agreed that the fire was hot enough to melt steel. You contradict yourself by buying the government theory while at the same time saying there were temperatures hot enough to soften/weken steel, which according to NIST did not occur.

So which is it? The government theory or temperatures hot enough to soften and melt steel?

:D