Quote:
Originally Posted by eroticsexxx
The initial prosecutor did want to proceed, but the moved was blocked for whatever reason.
An impartial prosecutor had to come in and analyze the facts of the case. If there wasn't enough evidence to continue, the refusal to charge Zimmerman would have be vindicated.
|
I doubt it... they would have just kept looking until they found someone who would prosecute.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eroticsexxx
Cases become public knowledge well in advance in many instances. This does not stop these cases from going to court.
|
I was speaking more along the lines of him ending up dead first...
Quote:
Originally Posted by eroticsexxx
This is not a racism-fueled hate crime. That is not my opinion of the matter. My view is that Zimmerman's collective actions in the scenario indeed exemplified dangerous conduct that resulted in Martin's killing. Evidence shown thus far prove this.
|
Everyone sure as shit is making it out to be.
To begin with, look at how badly and adamantly the media flat out lied. Where's the justice for knowingly and purposefully fabricating evidence in order to sway the public's opinions? Do you honestly believe any jury in Florida is going to be unbiased? Are you seriously that jaded? Oh, one guy got fired, big deal. Chances are he'll have another job within a month or 2.
And just today.. look at the headlines... "Zimmerman 'profiled' Trayvon Martin, prosecutor's filings claim". If you don't think that's not them trying to make this a racially motivated hate crime then I don't know what to tell you.
The "unbiased" prosecutor is doing nothing but playing the race angle because that is the only thing he has. The rest of the evidence doesn't prove anything, so all he can try to do is present said evidence in such a way to make it more than it was. They are going to try and sway the jury's view (as if it can be any more swayed than it already is) of zimmerman as some black hating racist, and then they'll serve up the actual facts of the case.