Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
The government theory has told people that office fires somehow managed to destroy the buildings.
The presence of liquid steel and iron spheres, while denied by the official theory, point to temperatures above those of office fires.
Since office fires have never before demolished buildings, there has to be another explanation than the official theory as to why those buildings were destroyed.
Which is it?
:D
|
You didn't answer my question. How hot was the fire(s)?
If you say not hot enough to melt steel, then thermite couldn't have been used.
If you say the fire was caused by thermite, then the steel obviously melted.