Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Time to wrap this up.
You - and the entire 9/11 so called "truth movement" has told us time and time again that the fires never got enough in the towers to cause the collapse. You've told us the fires never got hot enough to melt the steel, and you've told us the fires were 1500f.
But your auguring that Thermite and little particles of iron are proof that Thermite was used to bring down towers. Thermite burns at 4000F.
Thermite burns at more than twice what you've augured the fire temp was, and more than plenty to melt steel.
So which is it? Was the fire 4000F degrees and hot enough to melt steel? Or was the fire only 1500F, meaning it thermite was not used?
|
The government theory has told people that office fires somehow managed to destroy the buildings.
The presence of liquid steel and iron spheres, while denied by the official theory, point to temperatures above those of office fires.
Since office fires have never before demolished buildings, there has to be another explanation than the official theory as to why those buildings were destroyed.
Which is it?
:D