Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberHustler
I'm quite confident non-racist whites feel the same way most blacks do about this latino shooting this unarmed crying black kid who was screaming for help... after following him around and calling him a coon under his breath... while on the phone with a cop who was telling him not to follow the kid in the first place. If he's innocent, so be it... just hope they can't prove otherwise.
|
none of the things you mentioned alters the law though ?
Victim was black.
Shooter was latino
Victim was crying.
Shooter called him names.
Shooter warned not to follow.
The law that will be ultimately used in his defense doesn't have any stipulations that match the criteria.
example.. it doesn't say " but you cant shoot if the suspect is black" or "you can't shoot if suspect is crying"
the law is obviously vague, it should be changed. The law should not be ignored simply because of public opinion.
It reminds me of when they charge children as adults. It is the most ridiculous thing ever. It is like trying a cat as a dog because cat penalties are fucked up..