Originally Posted by MediaGuy

They cherry picked the testimony to exclude any evidence of explosions prior to the impacts, as well as any explosions whatsoever.


And the crime doesn't warrant volumes? The final report was pre-written, the conclusions scripted by Zelikow, anything that didn't fit the script were omitted.



The iron in your Red Bull isn't the same as that found in the dust from the destruction of the towers, which was much larger. An office fire and tons of concrete wouldn't turn iron to liquid, no matter the form.


I'm talking about the iron found in the dust by multiple investigators who weren't sanctioned by the government - insurance investigators, scientists, etc....


You're right - there's no proof either way, at least presented in this thread. However there's no proof that it was kept in storage at the site as well - and no reason for such a volatiile substance to be kept there. Thermite is usually carried to a site needing repair for this very reason.

And thermite isn't a point of contention here so much as thermate, which is a military grade version of thermite and shouldn't have been present in the debris from WTC.


That's exactly what happened. And how companies such as RJ Lee had samples of the dust at Deutche bank...



I don't know about "tones of explosives" as well as thermite and thermate are not explosives. I saw three buildings come down in one day in such a way that "natural" causes couldn't be considered.


"We" never determined the fires never got that hot. The official story claims there couln't have been such temperatures at WTC. Your claim contradicts your quote from the FEMA report about the damaged steel. It's not my position that there weren't such temperatures at WTC - it's obvious that there were. But the official story of office fires and the denial of post-destruction molten steel goes counter to this.