Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
It was one of the most in depth investigations ever done. It was created "to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11 attacks". Not only did they produce multiple volumes of findings, but also published a book and handed it out to the public. They interviewed thousands of people.
|
Yes and they excluded thousands of testimonies from their report. In fact, there was more excluded from the final document than was included.
It has been referred to off-handedly as the "9.11 OMISSION" report...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
One agency hand picked another agency's findings. No big surprise there.
|
True. But NIST refers to FEMA as a solid source, and bases its conclusions on their findings...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
There was no chain of custody. "Dust" was collected off site by random people that was examined by people outside the government. You can't even prove it was from the WTC complex.
|
You might have a point here. You'd have to prove it but you you know how much I like evidence...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
When the iron is already microscopic, of course it will.
|
Oh come on now. The amounts and the form the iron was found in deny any happenstance source...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
I have no idea what you talking here. There is some discussion about "molten steel" on 9/11 sites, but it wasn't steel at all. It was really glass and other metals.
|
No it was not "glass and other metals". It was iron, which was somehow separated from its alloy in the steel.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
We've been over this time and time again. These are common chemicals used in construction, for communication hubs, and power sub stations - all of which were present at the WTC complex.
|
No, even if they were present in the construction of the building, of which there is no proof, there's no reason they would be in the dust of the collapse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Clearly you know nothing about construction. You assumed that everything is "cleaned up". The truth is stuff gets hidden and buried.
|
"Stuff" does get hidden and buried. However there's no proof that thermite was used in the construction of the WTC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
When they built my parent's house, the back porch was originally a garbage pit. Anything they didn't need they threw into a huge pile, and then eventually they covered it up with concrete. I'm sure if you ripped open the walls of any large building, you would find the same. Hell, I've found all kinds of crap in my attic including an entire set of tools.
|
So this is some form of proof for the "cities" that were the WTC???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
On top of all of this, WTC was a massive construction site. You look at this as a "completed building" but the truth is the WTC was always a construction site. At any given time there was a number of construction zones there - Every time they had a new tenet they had to move walls, re-wire things, and god only knows what else. Half of both towers had been ripped apart over the past ten years to have asbestos removed or fire proofing installed.
|
So there was always an opportunity for crews to move in and place explosives? What are you trying to prove with this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
God only knows what they stored down in the basement levels to support this activity.
|
Whether God or whoever you want... maybe somebody should provide proof before making blanket statements...