Quote:
Originally posted by jact
When will I be considered a real pornographer like you, Paul? Or any of us for that matter? You did say that you were the only REAL pornographer here.. So what'll it take for us to be real?
|
More interesting is why you do not consider yourself a
real pornographer.
I never said I was the only one, I never you were not. So why do you not think you are?
But it's an interesting question, if put like this. "What is the difference between a pornographer and the photographer of naked women/sex acts?"
I think photography is technical and pornography is psychological. Let me explain, though this is a generalization.
Any one can shoot pictures of naked girls; it takes a pornographer to make it look as if the girl was ready to fulfill the viewer?s fantasy.
Anyone can shoot people having sex; it takes a pornographer to make it look like they were enjoying it, doing it to be seen, doing it so the viewer thinks he/she can join in.
Anyone can shoot a girl in leather, thigh boots, chains and with a whip. It takes a pornographer to make her a dominatrix.
The consumer of porn wants to see it in his minds eye, he wants to feel it so much he can taste it.
Do you shoot the fantasy or the meat?