Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
Eh... you're the one who's making stuff up here.... quote yourself some links here. The fire was nowhere near this hot except perhaps for a few seconds, which is nowhere long enough to cause the steel to weaken.
|
Sure.
However, the FEMA report did find that regions of steel in beams of the WTC had been subjected to "severe high temperature corrosion attack" and subsequent melting.[71] Further, the report found that temperatures of these regions of the steel beams investigated approached 1,000C degrees (1,800F), temperatures far lower than would be necessary for melting steel under ordinary circumstances.
(
source )
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
Did I make a mistake? I meant that the dust from the collapses was propagated far and wide from the site of the "collapses". Anything done at the site/s would not have gotten into apartments and work places a mile away after the fact.
|
Your telling me that dust collected "far and wide" (in Manhattan) is being used as evidence, and I'm trying to tell you that dust "collected" from any site a distance away from the WTC is most likely contaminated. You can't even be sure the dust being collected was from the WTC or another building.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
No, when little beads of iron are created that means temperatures were so high that iron was not just molten, it was vaporized. There's no way around this one.
|
If it was vaporized, how do you know it was iron?
Iron is in everything. Iron was smashed into a billion little pieces when the buildings fell. Not to mention the fireball.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediaGuy
You're right. Normal building debris wouldn't have iron micro-spheres in it at all; that there were points to temperatures very much above that of an office fire.
|
You missed my point entirely. What I was saying is that no one takes microscopic samples of "normal building debris". And it's irreverent - A normal building isn't a city of fifty thousand people.
The 9/11 Truth Movement have become so desperate for attention that they have over analyzed everything, and they are grasping at straws to prove there was explosives. Tiny iron particles aren't proof that there was explosives, it was proof that there was concrete.