Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
If Suze Randal gets taken out, there very few to replace her. I use Suze as an example. It can be a number of other shooters top in their field. So don't aim snipes at Suze, I use her as an example to counter Ruff's stance of anyone can do shoot content.
|
Paul, when I said anyone can shoot content, it doesn't necessarily mean there aren't good shooters out there. It just means there's a lot of people generating content good and bad. There is also a huge market for unprofessionally produced porn for exgf sites, amateur sites and tubes. This product does not lend itself to magazines and film does it? You spoke about Met-Life, don't they have a number of competitors now? The surfer is not as discriminating as you and others. Of course they like a good picture, but they also will like a bad one. The Internet is what it is now. The only market that gives away it's product to make money. As long as the amateur is able to come into this market with an insignificant investment it will always be so. What you are doing is pissing into the wind, you need to turn around and piss the other way. Using hindsight to make your points is an awfully easy way to pontificate. We can all do that when we retire. What would be interesting to discuss is business models that do work in today's adult environment.