View Single Post
Old 06-14-2003, 04:28 AM  
Mr.Fiction
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Free Speech Land
Posts: 9,484
Quote:
Originally posted by Pleasurepays


you are still talking about something different. the law has not changed. you are talking about using images of a minor and manipulating images of a minor. that has nothing to do with saying "hi, I'm Cindy and i just turned 13, please come watch me take a cock in all holes"
You are still wrong, but I love you anyways.

Here is a comment from the article on the case that I linked to earlier:

The opinion cited several artistically significant instances in which teenage sex was portrayed, including William Shakespeare's play "Romeo & Juliet," and the recent movies "Traffic" and "American Beauty."
http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/04/16/sc...al.child.porn/

Nothing to do with computers in those cases, which the court specifically cited, when deciding to overturn the law.

The court specifically had problems with the idea that a person pretending to be underage having sex was illegal under the law.

Your turn.
Mr.Fiction is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote