Quote:
Originally posted by Pleasurepays
you are still talking about something different. the law has not changed. you are talking about using images of a minor and manipulating images of a minor. that has nothing to do with saying "hi, I'm Cindy and i just turned 13, please come watch me take a cock in all holes"
|
You are still wrong, but I love you anyways.
Here is a comment from the article on the case that I linked to earlier:
The opinion cited several artistically significant instances in which teenage sex was portrayed, including William Shakespeare's play "Romeo & Juliet," and the recent movies "Traffic" and "American Beauty."
http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/04/16/sc...al.child.porn/
Nothing to do with computers in those cases, which the court specifically cited, when deciding to overturn the law.
The court specifically had problems with the idea that a person pretending to be underage having sex was illegal under the law.
Your turn.
