Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
But Greg, But Greg, but Greg. This is where you always screw up.
|
This is where you assume you understand what I am saying, but you are listening without hearing, or hearing more than what is said. For example:
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
Even if this was the first time in history that a black box wasn't recovered, it is not automatic proof that there is a cover up.
|
This is true. But I didn't make the statement that not finding the black boxes was proof, automatic or otherwise, of anything.
I brought them up to illustrate the need for an investigation, being one of dozens if not hundreds of unusual, unlikely factoids about the events that day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
You do this all the time.
|
Your precognitive "hearing" is at work again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
You say that buildings never fell like that before, THEREFORE XYZ must be TRUE.
|
Actually, I say buildings never fell like that before, THEREFORE there should be investigation.
What I actually say:
The fact that not one but three historically unprecedented events such as buildings collapsing due to fire is another of the many, many unusual if not impossible occurrences on that day - if you consider the official story.
Since there was
- molten metal under the buildings so long
- so much (discounted) testimony of explosive events prior to collapse,
- enormous amounts of liquefied iron in the dust
- unignited thermate in the dust
- rapid onset of the collapse events
- symmetry in all three collapses
- no resistance in their descents
among many other facts, I say the officially and popularly believed theory cannot be correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
Actually, it;s conspiracy theorists that overlook scientific fact in their zealous attempts to simultaneously deny reality and spin some kind of fantasy world where they are clued in to what?s really going on.
|
You're probably right in many cases, I don't know all conspiracy theories around that day. Certainly you're right about the government's conpiracy theory and those who believe it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
I think you automatically push anything out that doesn't agree with your pre existing determination of 9/11 invents.
|
The only thing I "push out" is the conclusion arrived at from the official collapse theory's "probable sequence" of events, which is incomplete due to the omission of, or lack of, available data. I'm certain most of the statements are individually and scientifically correct.
:D