View Single Post
Old 03-17-2012, 08:37 AM  
MediaGuy
Confirmed User
 
MediaGuy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montrealquebecanada
Posts: 5,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
Google "thermite smoking gun". This was huge of the 9/11 Truth groups.
Ok.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
Both towers were built using thermite. Anyone who researches thermate for sixty seconds on Wikipedia knows this. It's common sense that thermite was found in the debris.
I did a sixty-second search and didn't find anything. Link me up if you can. "Common Sense" is the weakest of arguments.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
So they only found trace elements of explosives, not enough to alarm anyone, but you still think the towers were intentionally taken down by explosives?
Explosives explode. Incendiaries burn. Evidence is usually kept and inspected during the course of an investigation, which wasn't conducted in this case, for whatever reason you care to theorize.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
Where they looking for thermite, because they managed to find that. Why would they be looking for thermite and not general explosives?
NIST didn't find that. And fire investigation protocols demand that once any unusual events are detected in a building fire, specific accelerants and incendiaries must be looked for. NIST looked for nothing, because there was nothing to look for.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
Didn't they just do general chemical analysis?
No chemical analysis. They conjectured.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
Your saying they should have done a special investigation into the fact that they found thermite, and I'm telling you that they used Thermite to build the building and on repairs since then.
No I'm saying they should have done an investigation, period.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
In fact, somewhere on site there must have been a huge bag of the stuff in the event they needed it.
"Somewhere" and "must have" again. There's no evidence of this.

An investigation would have answered many of these questions.

Some reading: http://www.fireengineering.com/artic...stigation.html

You should also look up the NFPA fire and explosives investigation manual to understand that even normal house fires are investigated using process of elimination, even when it's not obvious arson, incendiary, accelerant or explosive evidence is present.
__________________

YOU Are Industry News!
Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
ICQ: 248843947
Skype: Mediaguy1
MediaGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote