Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Obenberger
Tough talk isn't ever hard during an election year.
If he's going to actually get any convictions, he's got to convince the Arizona judges to turn around and change their reasoning.
In the Taylor case from 1990, they had no problems with the California cases that hold that the activity essential to making explicit videos is not prostitution. Taylor was a peep show dancer and the court said that her conduct was miles away from what the California Supreme Court protected in Freeman.
Read the cases for yourself. They are all here. http://www.xxxlaw.com/articles/porno....and.porn.html
It's the best indication we have of how Arizona judges would rule. I think this prosecutor has an uphill battle whether he knows it or not. |
They might not be able to win a conviction, but they sure can make life hell. Constant raids, computer and content seizures, etc.
So again, I wonder if this is something they'd pursue if you were caught in the act, or if all it would take is finding a video on the internet and issuing a warrant based on that.