Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Let's take a look at what you did say:
There's also USGS and other reports of trace elements of materials like Barium that can't be present in anthing other than explosive/incendiary metal-cutting activity.
You said it can't be present unless there is "explosive/incendiary metal-cutting activity". But you forgot to mention "fluorescent lights". Plenty of that going on in the WTC.
|
Fine, I mispoke and should have re-read this to include "can't be present
at such high levels" and then seen if I could reference the statement. Just speaking from memory, which can suck when you're an old fart...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Why are these stories not reported, under reported, or just plain ignored?
|
If everyone says you're an unpatriotic, callous kook for doubting the official story and disrespecting the victims and their families, or if your career as a journalist is at risk for going against the grain, then perhaps you won't want to cover such testimony.
As for the reason the oral and written testimonies of New York fire fighters were suppressed... that would have to be looked up. I don't remember the reason or if those who were responsible for releasing them ever said why they weren't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
I've heard about such stories, but usually they are explained by "I heard an explosion in the basement" because fireballs traveled down the elevators and into multiple lower levels. It's possible they didn't feel the impact, or felt it and didn't even think twice about it. It's also possible that they have confused the first few moments of what happened - very common in such circumstances.
|
People who had worked at the Towers for years, even decades, could not have mistaken the occurrence and direction of explosive sensations.
The firefighters and other first-responders as well as regular citizens who described firecracker-like belt-detonations coming down the buildings seem pretty clear on their recollections, and corroborate external, physical evidence that more realistically explains the building crashes than office fires.
The bottom three-quarters to two-thirds of the two towers could not have been compromised so extensively by impacts and fires. Molten metal could not have been produced in such amounts that the pools lasted for weeks unless incendiaries were first used.
Referring to the videos, corner-beam assemblies couldn't have been blown out/up as we saw, without explosive means.