Quote:
Originally Posted by Qbert
It's biased because the law impacts one segment of voters significantly more than others. In this case Latino voters are far more likely to not have the required forms of ID.
|
Why would a Latino not need ID and more than a white person? Because he is an illegal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by uno
If there is little fraud, why the need for extra regulations on it?
It's biased because it disproportionately affects certain segments of the population in favor of or for a generally more favorable(to those doing the changing) demo. A lot of places, a photo isn't required at all on gov't issued id's, let alone photo, supporting documents such as a birth certificate or other. Poor people, for example, may not be able to get to a DMV or may not need to at all if they don't have a car and no need to drive.
Some places the proposed regulations for voting are tighter than for buying a gun.
Different states have been taking different steps to disenfranchise voters so YMMV.
|
What "proposed regulations" are stricter than to get a gun? Where? What government ID does not have a photo on it?
Where in this country is it not required to have ID if you are over 18? Have a reliance for that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks
1. Do some research on ACORN. It allegedly conducted voter fraud on a massive scale.
|
This is one instance that he is correct.