Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty F
Mediaguy, we're on page 16 now. Maybe it's time you show us some kind of evidence that the US government was behind this attack. The same question to your fellow nutjobs.
|
I'm not saying and didn't say the US government was behind it, so I don't see why I'd have to put up any kind of "evidence" they were behind it.
Over and over I've said I'm not out to point fingers or place blame, that's just ultimately fruitless speculation, and I repeated that, whoever did it, the US government and its cronies (be it big oil, the weapons and private security industries, banking, possibly the opium trade, domestic control and surveillance, the intelligence branches) definitely profited from 9/11.
The only thing that is definite is that the destruction of the buildings wasn't "organic" or gravity-driven; there is little or no proof beyond speculation and conjecture on behalf of government bodies, and there is very interesting and solid evidence on the side of incendiary demolition tactics.
One is the presence of small iron spherical particles in all the dust collected in the debris and elsewhere in the city, by both government and independant agencies - which means that something was so hot it melted then vaporized or aerosolized molten metal, which couldn't have occurred in any office fire condition or even the most extreme temperatures reported by both NIST and FEMA.
The other is the presence of un-ignited incendiary particles of probably military grade materials, thermite or thermate, reported in an unchallenged (and frankly ignored) scientific paper on the matter.
There's also USGS and other reports of trace elements of materials like Barium that can't be present in anthing other than explosive/incendiary metal-cutting activity.
Finally there's eyewitness and video/audio testimony of not only explosions and explosive sounds, but the presence of molten metal, friggin' lava, under all the debris, that was recorded for weeks and weeks after the buildings were felled.
That's the physical aspect.
There's all sorts of circumstantial and co-related evidence that seem to demonstrate that this was an expected event, planned and programmed, that only made it into the public record years later or just surfaced after Freedom of Information requests and other divulgations and investigations occurred.
At best, it seems Government entities like NIST were involved in a cover-up, ignoring most of the physical evidence that couldn't be swept under the carpet to produce their computer models and animations of the damage and "disproportionate collapse" of the buildings as though nobody were going to look into it.