View Single Post
Old 03-10-2012, 05:14 AM  
Ann-Angelcom
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: new york
Posts: 500
Can I just point out again the simple fact of wtc7 falling and the govt saying it sustained so much damage it fell? Forget the fact that the news anchors and even the owner of the site Silverstein all said it was planned. Just look at that map again and use common sense. You see the buildings that are almost attached to the twin towers that's how close they are? They are all fine today and standing. Not only that but had you visited the site a short time after the attack you would know that those buildings also did not look bad at all!!! The windows and faces that were directly facing the twin towers were all blown out. But that was it!!!!!!! So now you're going to believe wt7 which is behind another building that is massive collapsed because of damage from the attack? But the one between it and the source of the attack blast is standing just fine? How much more proof do you need that it's impossible!? If you've never been to the site or visited the towers before the attack to know how this area is set up first hand Just keep your mouth shut.
__________________
Digitalangeldollars.com 10% on all referrals!! NOW PAYING 75% OF ALL SALES!!!
Ann-Angelcom is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote