View Single Post
Old 03-07-2012, 01:23 AM  
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
There are no free rides. Either you pay for it this way or you pay for it that way. Unless you're one of those who should be looked after.

So will paying for Disaster relief via private companies cost less than paying for it in your taxes?

Well a quick look can tell us about private health care cost v public health care costs.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_...ry_comparisons





http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...ryId=110997469

Quote:
The United States spends more on medical care per person than any country, yet life expectancy is shorter than in most other developed nations and many developing ones. Lack of health insurance is a factor in life span and contributes to an estimated 45,000 deaths a year. Why the high cost? The U.S. has a fee-for-service system?paying medical providers piecemeal for appointments, surgery, and the like. That can lead to unneeded treatment that doesn?t reliably improve a patient?s health. Says Gerard Anderson, a professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health who studies health insurance worldwide, ?More care does not necessarily mean better care.? ?Michelle Andrews


Now then anyone who thinks that moving it to the private sector won't mean them paying for a disaster in another part of the country, or the rebuilding of another persons home, knows nothing about how the insurance industry works.

If I need to explain it, then you shouldn't be posting here.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote