Quote:
Originally Posted by RRACY
WB11's, wackadoodle coverage of a flying bomb and failed computer graphics
She first described it as what might be a police helicopter and after she realized it caused the explosion, changed her thoughts in that moment. These women literally got trapped in the twilight zone. If it wasn't a helicopter, (no propeller) it certainly could not have been a plane. She simply repeated what it was supposed to be, but the orb was shown at least six more times and was described as a plane or twin engine jet.
The first computer generated image was first shown only one minute after the last orb. You can see the time change to 9:27. The fake image is so poor that it has no wings and two dots for engines. Notice the drone move directly east and cgi more left/north.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=nKj0H...8AE&index= 30
https://youtube.com/watch?v=LIyGE...8AE&index= 34
|
Your seriously starting to look like an idiot.
A news reporter, god only knows where, is reporting what she sees at the exact moment of the second impact:
"You can see there are choppers, I believe that could be a police helicopter that is... Oh.. Oh my goodness... We just saw another, I believe it was a plane...."
She says she sees helicopters, and then she says a plane hit the tower. We can see the video, and clearly it's a plane. You've posted half a dozen pictures of what is obviously a plane.
Not to mention a thousand other witnesses that saw a plane.