Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
I take your point, though I was just pointing out (to PR Glen) that some 'Conspiracy Theorists' do have half-decent jobs to counter his theory
|
Sure, there's a lot of highly trained people that believe in their version of what happened. But you can take twenty engineers or scientists, show them the evidence, and ask what happened, and your not going to get the same answers. Multiple the numbers by hundreds of thousands of engineers and scientists, and you'll get lots of different people saying different things.
I look at it this way... If ten people witness a car accident from ten different angles, when police interview them all and write up their reports, they are going get ten different views on what really happened. This is because everyone saw the same thing, but saw it differently. What happened on 9/11 was filmed from hundreds of different angles that day, and yet still years later we debate what happened and who was behind it.
We can argue this until we are blue in the face, but the one thing the 9/11 Truth Movement can't tell me is why. Why would our government do this? There's no oil in Afghanistan. Some have mentioned a pipeline, but that doesn't make sense to me - more than ten years later it hasn't been built, and why would you want to build a pipeline to a land locked country? I've also read that we wanted an excuse to invade Afghanistan to set up us to attack Iran - Well, we had Iran surrounded, and ten years later we still haven't attacked Iran, and in fact we are pulling our troops out of the area, so that doesn't add up.