Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Hammer
http://www.rabbitsreviews.com/s9991/Lil-Candy.html
Can you tell me if something just doesn't seem right here?
Content Quality 15/15
Usability 9/10
Updates 5/10
Content Amount 7/15
Value 8/10
Unique Content 15/15
Video Downloads 5/5
Video Streaming 5/5
Features 4/5
Other Score 2/10
overall score 75 out of 100
Even though it's a solo site, it is scored the same as "super sites" for amount of content and updates.
Photo sets no longer count as updates, Only video updates count.
Other score = based on the reviewer?s discretion. really has nothing to do with features or facts.
|
I doesn't make sense from being to end...
Content quality 15/15 means that it is perfect (to me that would mean shot as well as HBO drama )
But then only 7/15 for content amount , but what does this mean ? that is is too expensive for the amount of material here? But NO Value is 8/10 so it is good value for money. Its all nonsense.
The idea is to lower the score so that it does not appear in the top positions, one can assume there is a reason they want to send 90% of their traffic to the same mediocre sites.