Quote:
Originally Posted by trevesty
It depends entirely on your niche.
With that said, I won't promote a site that clearly hasn't been updated design wise since 2000 unless other guys I know says it converts crazy good.
An amateur, solo girl site that's intended to be raw and raunchy and looks like the girl herself designed it will do well.
A solo girl site that's intended to be classy and glamorous should be designed to reflect that.
In short, there's no right answer.
|
I agree on you with all your points...I was mainly referring to the sites that just look plain bad and aren't purposely created to look amateur (especially ones that have like a miniblog on the tour and have 2007 as the last update).