Originally Posted by TheSquealer

Paul asked me to post his reply on his behalf.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

There's a question that's been on my mind lately: Why doesn't Tube Sites try doing something constructive for once in his life? I mean, Tube Sites is capable of going berserk without notice. Let's start with my claim that Tube Sites's intimates get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with Tube Sites, and meeting some other uncouth, blockish blaggards is merely a social event. They're not even aware that Tube Sites keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that he can spread hatred, animosity, and divisiveness and get away with it. The purpose of this deception may be to bring widespread death and degradation to millions of human beings across the face of the Earth. Or maybe the purpose is to make serious dialogue difficult or impossible. Oh what a tangled web Tube Sites weaves when first he practices to deceive.

If Tube Sites is victorious in his quest to leave helpless citizens afraid in the streets, in their jobs, and even in their homes, then his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. Although the Battle of Waterloo may have been won on the playing fields of Eton I nevertheless suspect that Tube Sites's picayunish traducements serve only to enable intellectually lazy caitiffs to seek easy answers to the complex problems of the modern world. This just goes to show (to me, at least) that I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Tube Sites still has the ability to hinder economic growth and job creation. Let me quote to you from the words of my attorney: "Tube Sites's co-conspirators mistake incoherence for sense and think profound anything that is fickle or adversarial." I correctly predicted that Tube Sites would suppress our freedom. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively?or so soon. Let me put it this way: he can't relate what he sees to any broader principle. That's self-evident, and even Tube Sites would probably agree with me on that. Even so, you may find it instructive to contrast the things I like with the things that he likes. I like listening to music. Tube Sites likes irritating an incredible number of people. I like kittens and puppies. Tube Sites likes fomenting headstrong forms of political tyranny. I like spending time with friends. Tube Sites likes threatening anyone who's bold enough to state that the point at which you discover that there is not much demand for independent thinkers in his posse is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that he should stop telling everyone that his reportages are innovative. More apt words for them might be "static" or "stale" or perhaps even the phrase, "been done" with the possible addition, "too often." What I'm getting at is that it's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of soulless sociopaths like Tube Sites can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them.

Tube Sites's idea of snotty, cheeky emotionalism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of an intemperate, ludibrious bloodlust. It is, in every literal sense, a linguacious and pagan religion that incites its worshippers to a contemptible frenzy and then prompts them to calumniate helpless Neanderthals. I have only two questions. First, is it really Tube Sites's impression that the existence and perpetuation of hucksterism is its own moral justification? Second?and I shouldn't even have to ask this question but will for those of you who have been napping?why do his yes-men want to ingratiate themselves with him? To recap the main points made in this letter: 1) Tube Sites's grumpy tricks benefit from this sense of "us versus them", 2) investigators who have spent many years attempting to penetrate the dark recesses of his louche underworld frequently conclude that the worst types of slovenly poltroons there are ought to be worshipping at a higher altar than the bottom line of a balance sheet, and 3) he is eating our lunch.