Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
No point in arguing with you. I do this for a living.
|
there is no point in arguing because you are wrong and have less experience
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
I offered to prove it to you.
|
Yet when asked to prove it apparently you chickened out..
I know because its what I do and I have to deal with this constantly. It's not a secret in the SEO/Blackhat community, its a fact that every one has to deal with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
I have dedicated boxes running several copies of xrumer and scrape box and some other link building tools. I know quite well what will happen when I push the "go" button.
|
so then it should be easy enough for you to prove. Yet you haven't..
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
[*]Yes, a sudden volume of weak links to a low authority site (which GFY is not - but probably still could be affected) will cause that site to drop in ranking for the phrases targeted. Though I haven't played with this much in the last 6 months, typically you need many 100s-1000s per day and usually after a day or two, its gone for a couple months or more.
|
yet you cant prove it
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
[*]Yes, Google is much better at identifying spam links today than in years past and devaluing them
|
DEVALUING being the key word.. not penalized
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
[*]No, Google doesn't care WHO caused those links to happen
|
they are valueless it doesn't matter
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
[*]Yes, I am talking from practical experience
|
so am i , although much more experience than yours..
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
[*]No, you are not talking from practical experience
|
i have several years on you
