Quote:
Originally Posted by Colmike7
It led to more money spend on advertising....
I know that there are much better ways to market porn than tubes and massive traffic, which is why I mostly do niche/micro niche blogging to compete with tubes to get people that are really into their niche or to catch them with thousands of longtails (I didn't mention this before, but it's any search of say 4 or more keywords) before they get on a tube..
I just like to argue random bs because that's how I learn  |
In truth Mike no one but the big card processors know if there's more money spent on online porn today than in 2007/8. All we have is indicators.
Lots of good sites are suffering, not just the poor sites as ST claims. The problem is few will come onto a board and publicly announce it, it's all show. Tell people you're doing great and affiliates send traffic. Tell them you're doing bad and they don't.
Pimproll are trying to make money by giving away porn they paid for, to sell the traffic it generates. The prime porn domain of porn.com is now a Tube site. Because a Tube site makes more money that a paysite? Of course. Why is the question.
ST's answer is something that always happens, the weak get cut out. Now we are seeing the PR turning to running a Tube site. Were they one of the weak? Were those whooping over the returns on their traffic to that site strong or weak?