View Single Post
Old 02-02-2012, 01:25 PM  
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc112/h1981_rh.xml the House version of the bill


http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc112/s1308_is.xml the Senate version of the bill



"Knowingly" but will the money transaction processors take it upon themselves to question the possible liability in making porn related transactions? This is an attempt to cut off the money supply to porn under the ever popular "c/p protect the children mantra."

You cannot constitutionally only require content based website retention.



Back to ridiculing reddit ...
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote