Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
did you even read the complaint they were talking about TV SHOWS that shit that people have a right to backup if they want.
|
Shouldn't that be: That "some" people "might" have the right to back up and recover.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
but even in your example
Some countries don't have anti-caming laws, so in those countries
If a person from that country simply recorded, and backed up (without sharing it with anyone) yes that would also not be infringement.
|
For the miniscule amount of users that might do that, in the tiny amount of countries that allow it (and yes I know they exist) it technically wouldn't.
But, part of the DMCA is that service providers "not be aware of the presence of infringing material or know any facts or circumstances that would make infringing material apparent".
Once they receive a DMCA regarding that movie, they have all the relevant links they need to identify "all" infringements regarding that move if identically linked....which in this example would be 10 dmca'd - leaving 490, minus any found to be non infringing from the few users in countries that don't have anti-camming.
So using my example of Ghost Protocol and being that filelockers connect identical files, they would still be in breach if they didn't remove every single infringing link.
Which is clearly not happening.
So, they still wouldn't qualify for safe harbor.