GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

LeeNoga · 06-12-2003, 06:19 AM

Wimpy, using a stand alone system allows the IP to be indentified and blocked etc.

Sounds like the nay sayers' don't want the images looked at and hashed.

But , if there was only an intense script running, this would be more accepting? Meaning if the program found a flag, it would be human verified before reported to the sponsor.

Interesting when this software is discussed, the debate differs between the places.

You are saying if this system were centrally hosted and sponsors did not have to release sensitive data [Known URL's of their affiliates], we did not look at images, and only did a review of URL, meta, alt tags and all text would have value to the sponsors?

Sponsors?

As far as catching images, the only way that would work is if we databased bazillion of images first, were given the images you wanted us to search on.

We are building this database, have been but its no where ready to be used as a tool to catch copyrighted images.

Would be nice if content providers embedded something into their image unique, there have been services out there like BayTSP, and watermarking companies, dunno how they fared over the years.

So you nay sayers, what would you find accepting for sponsors to do without pissing you off to no end. To boycott them for wanting to evaluate what their affiliates are doing is not exactly the answer either. The pressure keeps us developing nothing as an industry, it should not be used to punish our business [new tools].

So what compromise is acceptable, how far do you think they should be allowed to go without making you feel violated, if thats even the right word?

For those that deal in sodomy and all the other areas of adult mentioned in earlier posts You can hardly get on our case if your caught. If you are going to deal in high risk content where there are known laws against it in some states, have a look at yourself first. Your rolling the dice, its fate as to whether the dice rolls "Craps" :-)

06-12-2003, 06:19 AM
LeeNoga Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Egg & Sperm Mutation Posts: 3,043	Wimpy, using a stand alone system allows the IP to be indentified and blocked etc. Sounds like the nay sayers' don't want the images looked at and hashed. But , if there was only an intense script running, this would be more accepting? Meaning if the program found a flag, it would be human verified before reported to the sponsor. Interesting when this software is discussed, the debate differs between the places. You are saying if this system were centrally hosted and sponsors did not have to release sensitive data [Known URL's of their affiliates], we did not look at images, and only did a review of URL, meta, alt tags and all text would have value to the sponsors? Sponsors? As far as catching images, the only way that would work is if we databased bazillion of images first, were given the images you wanted us to search on. We are building this database, have been but its no where ready to be used as a tool to catch copyrighted images. Would be nice if content providers embedded something into their image unique, there have been services out there like BayTSP, and watermarking companies, dunno how they fared over the years. So you nay sayers, what would you find accepting for sponsors to do without pissing you off to no end. To boycott them for wanting to evaluate what their affiliates are doing is not exactly the answer either. The pressure keeps us developing nothing as an industry, it should not be used to punish our business [new tools]. So what compromise is acceptable, how far do you think they should be allowed to go without making you feel violated, if thats even the right word? For those that deal in sodomy and all the other areas of adult mentioned in earlier posts You can hardly get on our case if your caught. If you are going to deal in high risk content where there are known laws against it in some states, have a look at yourself first. Your rolling the dice, its fate as to whether the dice rolls "Craps" :-)