View Single Post
Old 01-20-2012, 10:45 AM  
raymor
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch
clip from Kill Bill etc,... a clip from a hollywood movie stolen and placed on youtube is no different than a stolen bigtit vid.

pot meet kettles.
The law says it's different, and those who incest in producing content say it's different.
A clip from a two hour movie is normally fair use for two different reasons. a) it's a tiny part of a much larger work and b) it does not compete with legitimate performance of the work. That is, you don't watch a clip of Kill Bill instead of going to see the movie. So it's double fair use.

People sering a funny clip from Kill Bill are more likely to buy or watch the movie, so producers generally like that, not complain about it.

When someone steals a twenty minute porn vid, that's the whole work or a significant portion, so it's not fair use like a thirty second clip is. It also competes directly with the legitimate creator of the work. Why buy a membership when you can see all the same full length videos on sites that stole them? That's the second difference and reason the stolen porn video isn't fair use.

Last edited by raymor; 01-20-2012 at 10:52 AM..
raymor is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote