helterskelter we already won. The bill has been withdrawn. The disinformation campaign can stop. Everybody already decided it was a bad idea, so there is no more need for hyperbole.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by helterskelter
Linking to a site which contains infringing material is not "facilitating" piracy or counterfeiting? Really? Says who?
|
Says SOPA:
Quote:
|
site is primarily designed or operated for the purpose of, has only limited purpose or use other than, or is marketed by its operator or another acting in concert with that operator for use in, offering goods or services in a manner that engages in, enables, or facilitates--(I) a violation of section 501 of title 17, Unit States Code; (II) a violation of section 1201 of title 17, Un States Code; or (III) the sale, distribution, or promotion of goods, services, or materials bearing a counterfeit mark, as that termis defined in section 34(d) of the Lanham Act or section 2320 of title 18, United States Code;
|
__________________
For historical display only. This information is not current:
support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
Strongbox - The next generation in site security
Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids
|