Quote:
Originally posted by PornDollar
On a business built on reputation, they have no regard for the damage that is caused by false allegations.
False claims and slander is taken VERY seriously.
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Chris Mallick
When I find out how you are, I am going to go after you for defamation and slander.
|
What you guys are really pissed about is that I actually read the lawsuit, and have been pointing out the facts as outlined in that lawsuit.
If you don't like someone pointing out the details Chris --- and you were expecting some blind cheerleading mantra, well --- you probably shouldn't have posted it in the first place.
PornDollar, you obviously haven't read the lawsuit. It might help if you did.
http://www.paycom.net/mastercard/lawsuit.pdf
And BTW Chris, You might want to consult a lawyer on the actual legal definition of slander. You don't even come close with your ridiculous threats.
You can't "slander" someone if you base your opinions on facts, which is exactly what I've done.
I could go through all of the page citations again, but I've already done that on other threads.
Are you now disputing the following facts as outlined in the lawsuit?
* Epoch violated MC's 1 percent chargeback rule for eight months in 2001-2002, a good year and a half after MC implemented the 1 percent rule.
* Epoch says there was other data showing chargeback violations after that, but Epoch says it was reported to MC in error.
* MC says Epoch has violated other rules by issuing too many refunds "in lieu" of chargebacks.
* MC has imposed substantial punitive fines, and is currently fining Epoch $2,500 a day --- demanding they restructure their entire business, or they will cut them off.
* MC accounts for 40 percent of Epoch's revenues, so if MC cuts them off, it could worsen the above mentioned cash flow problem.
Where are the false allegations and claims?
I've expressed opinions based upon the above mentioned facts, as is my right.
If you don't like it, hike it.
