Quote:
Originally posted by freeadultcontent
A husband and wife is not a business. Yet again with that type argument for an answer is unrelated.
|
that was an analogy to illustrate my point about liability to a third party that rendered an opinion based on documentable evidence.
yes, i did say you had some good points, and i considered them based upon my opinion and current understanding of the world. you asked in a follow up message for me to give my thoughts, not an attorneys, so i did so.
you bring up a great point, about serving the billing companies instead of the sponsors. an idea that we had not considered, since the genesis of the idea was based on sponsor's problems.
the reason that we didn't consider that, is because sponsors are part of the industry. CC processors are the outsiders that do biz with adult because money is to be made, but publically distance themselves.
we weren't looking to create an internal policing force, but more of an internal/inside industry solution to sponsor's problems, as well as this industry's problem of CP tarnishing adult content.
this thread was started to see if sponsors saw having affiliate CP sites was a problem. I would say that our original question hasn't been answered by the sponsors, but has been answered by more tangential type points... all of which are great points in this spirited debate.. ...
much like you said, we could have just plowed through without evening giving a forum, but we wanted to hear the opinions.
sounds like no matter who Sniffy serves, there is still some negative feelings that sniffy is "big brother", that sniffy will "steal" webmaster's bandwidth, and that sniffy will be a potential false accuser to an innocent webmaster.
i think that sums up the negative points against sniffy, based on the posts.
-dj