Quote:
Originally Posted by DVTimes
I think one problem is they are scans from slides or/and negatives that were not scaned correctly.
i bet if they were scaned now correctly they would look much better.
i remeber scanning slides ages ago. some scanned great, while others scanned yuck. it depends on the film/negatives and if the scanner can scan they correctly.
|
No the problem is stupid people responding to the name of the poster more than the content.
If I'm so bad, every single shooter not selling to magazines who they claim is better. Is stupid. Because these sets earned far more than a custom shooter ever got paid for a set and would of made a sponsor's website content budget $0.
It has nothing to do with anything like that, they are my pictures, therefore crap girls and very bad shots.
Even Damian come's up with a stupid excuse about it being illegal. Shooting for magazines was never illegal in the UK.