Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill8
Because the phenylethylamines are a litle more likely to be abused as pleasure chemicals, giving the religious phobics who outlawed them in the first place more ammunition to use in the media wars that will certainly follow any legalization.
The tryptamines are more challenging, and while they cause intense pleasure they are inherently less likely to be used as pleasure chemicals because of their tolerance profile and because of the psychological challenges they present to the user.
But, ultimately because I'd rather have lsd and dmt personally, and I think the social effects of legalizing the study of consciousness that inevitably follows those molecules would benefit society the most.
I do love mescaline and mdma/mda, and agree that the PEAs should be legalized (under a licensing model I would say, both chemical classes should first be available under a licensing system, just to ease the transition.), and that they also could do astounding good for society.
|
PEAs tolerances are pretty close to trypts, not to even mention the cross tolerance between the two. I don't see an abuse potential any higher on 2cb than shrooms, for ex. or LSD vs mescaline. I am kind of against DMT and 5meo dmt for general use, but absolutely, a licensing system would be great. I simply don't think most people could handle a DMT/5 meo dmt or even lsd experience when I've seen people fall apart with something as mild as 2cb or 2ci.
I have no idea how such a licensing system would work, but tripping definitely is not for everyone.