Originally Posted by Dcat

Chumpsky is good on some issues, but he is still controlled, and working "within" the system at MIT. I think he has been given a longer leash to criticize the establishment on crimes committed overseas, but is never get too close to issues at home. If and when he does, it is only to keep a lid on it, never allowing that knowledge to turn into action. He acts more as a "gatekeeper" within.

For example his stance on 911. He basically won't touch it, other than to say it couldn't have been a conspiracy because basically people couldn't keep their mouths shut about it if it had been a conspiracy. Complete nonsense if you understand the Command Hierarchy, and Chain of Command. It only takes a few at the top to make things happen. The others involved are left so in the dark that they couldn't hope to put two-and-two together even if they had a small part in it.

Infinitely better than Chumpsky is none other than Dr. Webster Tarpley.