View Single Post
Old 12-16-2011, 05:55 PM  
wehateporn
Promoting Debate on GFY
 
wehateporn's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 27,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by porno jew View Post
you use as a source someone who believes that that vaccines are a jewish conspiracy to poison and kill gentiles. since you are anti-vaccine and use mullins as a reference it is fair to ask if you also believe in that theory.

so do you also believe vaccines are a jewish conspiracy to kill gentiles? yes or no.
Your logic is like a great dragon; it doesn't exist! The other day I explained to you what an Ad Hominem was, but you clearly didn't take it on board. This is why your world view is fundamentally flawed and inaccurate, because you've built it up based on a logical fallacy i.e. incorrect logical principle.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...d-hominem.html

An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:

1. Person A makes claim X.
2. Person B makes an attack on person A.
3. Therefore A's claim is false.

The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the argument being made).
__________________
wehateporn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote