Quote:
Originally posted by LeeNoga
In 1999 my old resource site put some heat on AVS, and alot of good came of it. They removed the search words, "lolita" and others. I also put some heat on Sextracker to stop the ability to search on unethical search terms, they complied under pressure.
Does it matter to some webmasters whether a sponsor has opted for a compliance check by Sniffy. Would that compliance build a better relationship between a sponsor and affiliate?
|
Hmm, you are still avoiding some answers here Lee. You said that the product would be following ASACP guidelines, but now you are saying they are two separate products.
You talk about legal issues like CP, and now you introduce words like unethical, which has nothing to do with legal in any sense of the word.
Then you talk about pressure on Andy (and remember, I was in that room in New Orleans putting the pressure on Andy in person, along with our brouhaha on topniche) and now you've gone beyond the scope of legal again.
Last but not least, what do you with sponsors from countries outside the US? Sponsors who live under a different legal system. Should sponsors in Canada be told about affiliates who have sites that show bondage and penetration in promoting another sponsor because thats against the law in Canada?
After all, you keep talking about the relationships here, surely if you can categorize photos, you aren't just doing it with a yes or a no?