|
Wouldn't hosting that album art image constitute infringement of 2257 since amazon or any site with the image would need docs to prove 18+? Or are older works grandfathered in? Since it's lavish display of a nipple wouldn't there be a shit-fit over it?
This opens up the doors up even further for the pedobear crowd to get away with their "art" even easier if this doesn't constitute infringement of laws. All they need to do is have the exploited children holding random objects, put an artistic name claim under it and voila.
There's no frigging way that album cover was all about an airplane... that's a brave claim by the artist but I still call bullshit. He knew what he was doing and was pushing limits for publicity.
|