Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
Which is essentially refusing to show proof. This is what yo do. You demand such a one sided agreement that nobody will ever call you on it thus you are safe in your realm of bullshit.
|
funny so it one sided for me to place a condition that i could only claim IF i was telling the truth.
if i was lying you would put the money up, i would fail to claim it and you would have paid out nothing.
The only reason to refuse is that you know it can be done.
you could charge what i charge for the shit i have shown you guys for free, analyse the kickstarter campaigns i showed you. understand them fully and you could teach that as a course for 2k a pop easy.
Quote:
Answer my question:
1. How much will you charge me to show me your system?
2. Do you have a money back guarantee so that if you show me the system and I decide it is not going to work for me I can choose not to use it and get my money back?
3. Will you be able to supply references of people who have used your system and can vouch for you?
|
1. 5 things i said would solve the problem one on one 45k + 10% forever.
2. yup refund is tied to agree to put everything that uses those techniques into public domain, that way you can't lie say you wouldn't use get your money back and then use it anyway.
3. nope not going to give you the name of someone you can copy without paying me.
Quote:
Bullshit. You are talking circles again. There is no difference. If I make a song and want to hold the copyright life and get paid anytime someone samples it or uses it or sells it, that is no different than you supplying someone with knowledge and they forcing them to pay you everytime they use it.
You use my music in your movie that you intend to make money off of = me getting paid.
Someone uses your system to sell their product = you getting paid.
there is no difference. You created something and every time someone wants to use it for a profit you want to get paid.
|
difference is you can use it for free if you are willing to put all your derived work into the public domain
you don't want to let them use it unless they get permission from you (even if they put all the derived work into the public domain)
BTW nothing says they can't profit from it, like i said you can still sell stuff that in the public domain
open source proves that
So again your bald face lying.