View Single Post
Old 11-20-2011, 04:23 PM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
You have never ONCE given any proof that you actually have anything to sell. You claim to give classes and all kinds of stuff, but you never have shown anything including a single canceled check or a receipt for a rented conference room or ANYTHING that would suggest you actually have something.
bald face lie

i never refused to show you proof i refused to show you proof for free

put the million dollars in an escrow account that is accessible and i will post the bill for conference room tomorrow.

Quote:
All you ever offer is to show someone how to do this and then make them enter an agreement that if they show someone else they have to put all their content into the public domain.

So answer me this: How much would you charge me to show me this magical formula of yours and teach me how to use it? Do you have a money back guarantee? Prior to me spending a dime on your service can you give me a list of clients or customers who can vouch for you?
the offer was i would show the public here the solution and if robbie used any of the techniques i showed him he would have put all his shit in the public domain.






Quote:
Actually, I wouldn't be opposed to all copyrights ending upon a person's death or after a reasonable amount of time thereafter. For example if someone lives to be 90 and they die, the copyright dies with them. But if they are like Kurt Cobain and die young, their family gets to hold onto it for at least that 30 year window.

Also, I find it kind of funny that you are pissed at people getting paid for life for their copyrighted works, yet you are doing the exact same thing. You claim that you teach people how to use your system and part of the deal (at least as I remember it from the big fallout with The Doc) is that you get something like 5% of whatever they make for a long as they use your system. So if I write a book I should be forced to give up my copyright which would force people to pay me if they used it after a set period of time, but it is okay for you to force people to pay you for life when they use your system to make money. How is that fair or different?
the difference is nothing i do stops your from enacting your fair use rights with whatever content i decide to publish.

And that all the difference in the world

i have no problem with you making money for the entire life of the copyright as long as you fully respect all the fair use rights.

BTW i am still alive, so how can you make that comparison, i haven't gotten anywhere close to the 70+ after death area which i object too.

by definition cutting the copyright to day of your death, still wouldn't apply to me yet.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote